Go back
| Abstract: |
|
A common problem in belief research seems to be a missing link between aspects of theory and empirical analyses and results. This issue highlights a question of how dependent empirical studies about beliefs actually are on the theoretical perspective described in the study. In this paper, I examine relationships between two different perspectives. One perspective focuses on belief change, and seems to rely on a type of cognitive perspective, where beliefs can be characterized as mental objects. The other perspective argues for moving away from such cognitive perspective and instead to adopt a participatory perspective in the analysis of mathematics teaching. The results show that the study about belief change is not dependent on seeing beliefs as mental objects, but that this study could as well have been located within a participatory perspective.
|
|
 |
Magnus Österholm
 Main page
 Publications
 CV
 Research
 Umeå University
 Umeå School of Education
 Faculty of Science and
Technology
 Department of Science
and Mathematics Education
 Umeå Mathematics
Education Research Centre
 Mid Sweden University
 Faculty of Science,
Technology and Media
 Department of Engineering,
Mathematics and Science
Education
 Monash University
 Faculty of Education
 Linköping University
 The Institute of Technology
 Department of Mathematics
|